Hi All,

We are performing an enhancement package instalation from ECC6 to ECC6

EHP6.

Initial SP level Basis 700 sp12

We are currently on the downtime step, in phase EU_SWITCH.and we are

getting the folowing error in file MSSPROCSTHROW.LOG

"Msg 50000, Level 16, State 62, Server SQC6001SAP16, Line 79

Creation of stored procedure 'sap_zz_create_jobs' threw SQL Error 2812:

Could not find stored procedure 'sap_perf_job_add'.

Execution completed successfully"

Didn't find much information about this.

Any ideas?

Regards,

Bruno

In this document I will outline the concept behind SPDD and SPAU and how modification adjustment transport requests should be created for automatic handling of adjustments during Support pack activity. This document can be used when handling adjustments using SPAM/SAINT tool.

During the SPDD_SPAU_CHECK phase of the support pack activity, SPAM tool scans for modified objects in the system. It compares the modified objects identified in the system to the NEW objects coming via the new support pack which are being applied in the current support pack queue. The modified objects consist of the repository and the dictionary objects. Modified objects mean SAP standard objects which are modified by the customer to suit their need. The tool makes a list of these objects and sorts then into type SPDD and SPAU. Objects classified under SPDD are dictionary objects( tables , structures, views etc. ). Objects classified into SPAU are repository objects ( Screen elements , reports, programs etc. ) .

Consider we have a 3 system landscape with SID’s DEV, QAS and PRD all in same transport landscape and domain controller. Initially the support packs are applied on DEV system. During the SPDD/SPAU phase we perform the adjustments on DEV system. The adjustments are locked in adjust modification requests. So we will create one request for SPDD and one request for SPAU. The objective now is that adjustments have to be handled automatically in QAS and PRD system.

Now the correct way to perform this as below. Consider we have one request for SPDD and one for SPAU. Please be aware that you need to release only the tasks. Not the request. The transport request will be released later by the system when we are tagging this as the adjustment transport request as shown below. If you have already released the transport request, you may have to create new transport request by including the objects or a transport of copies.

We have to assign the newly created transport for SPDD or SPAU or as below. Go to SPDD or SPAU screens after the requests are created.

• Click on the Assign transport button
• Furnish the Request/Task

• Sometimes you may have created several transport requests for SPDD or for SPAU. Now you can merge all these transport requests into a transport of copies. In that case make sure you Change the “Request Type” to transport of copies by “Transport of copies “ and below

• Click on the Check button once done.  The following screens are as below

• You will get the below message at the bottom of the screen once you press “YES”

Now when the request will be appended with request attributes which you can see via SE01. Basically the SPAM tool will compare the support pack level in the request attributes and only if the support packs level matches, the transport request will be accepted as an modification request. During the SP activity you have to provide these transports when modification adjustment pops up comes. This is the same procedure to be followed for both SPAM and SAINT.

In case you are using SUM tool, then you have to use 2 separate requests for SPDD and SPAU  and furnish them during the configuration roadmap step when the tool asks you.

DONTS

1. 1) SPDD has to be handled when SPAM/SAINT pops up for SPDD adjustment. If you skip SPDD when it is prompted all you dictionary modifications will be lost
2. 2) You are not supposed to import any transport requests during support pack activity as these transport requests may corrupt the transport programs responsible for support pack activity. Always include the modification adjustment transports for automatic SPDD/SPAU handling.

Hi All,

We are using ECC 6.0 EHP 3 with MSSQL 2005 ,

from last 2 days on words my SAP system full backup is getting canceled  with Backup Error: 3041, Severity: 16, State: 1. error message

Please let me know the reason , its an urgent requirement.

Dear Experts,

We are in the process of upgrading ECC system from SP11 to SP23 using SUM tool. We were in the middle of Pre-processing stage, but the process got hanged and when we try to restart it using STARTUP.BAT file of SUM tool DSU services is not starting. When i click STARTUP.BAT , starting DSUI screen will popup and it will terminate in few seconds.Please find the attached screen shot and jump.trace file for your reference and kindly help us to resolve this issue as soon.

Regards,

SURYA

Hi Gurus

We are in process to migrate our business transactions to a new productive instance, so in order to allow users to execute their responsabilities as transparent as posible, we need to créate all variants created in our actual SAP productive instance.

The SAP version for both productive instances is the same (SAP 6.0).

So, we need to know if there is a procedure to:

- Identify

- Create

- Transport (export, import)

all variants created in the actual SAP productive instance.

Please, let me know if you know a method for doing this.

Thank you

Best Regards.

Dear All,

I am facing below issue during EHP 6 upgradation. Extraction phase successfully completed but now stuck on below INCLUSION phase

SAPup_troubleticket.log

SAPup broke during phase EHP_INCLUSION in module PREP_EXTENSION / Extension module

Error Message: Unable to generate addon queue. Return Code = -99, Reason = "Add on installation/upgrade not yet complete.

CRTs are required", check log file 'SPDA_EHP_INCLUSION.LOG' for details

If you put new packages in the download directory, use option 'init' to upload them

Summary of SAPup:

-------------------------------------------------------------

SAPehpi Release:          lmt_005

SAPehpi Version:          SAPup release lmt_005 version 54.000

Start Release:                    700

Target Release:                    731

 

 

SPDA_EHP_INCLUSION.LOG

2 ETN085X"Calculate pure CRT Queue" "for installed Add-ons" "and already applied Support Packages" " "

3 ETN112 The OCS Package Queue is empty

2 ETN085X"Adding Add-on Installation Queue" " " " " " "

2EETN403 Add on installation/upgrade not yet complete. CRTs are required (which CRT and Add-On while I already download stack after successfully synch my test system(PRDSPT) from LMDB)

1 ETN214X."**************************************************"

1 ETN251   End of phase: "'Add-on Queue Calculation'"

1 ETN254       End date: "26.11.2013"

1 ETN255       End time: "15:44:11"

1 ETN214 ."**************************************************"

 

Please find attachments for complete log.

Regards,

You want to upgrade a NW portal from 7.0X to NW 7.30 or NW 7.4. I would explain in this document a procedure for carrying forward the custom developments  in customer name space or components other than name space "sap.com" into the target release .

Background

---------------

All SAP standard delivered objects are in name space "sap.com". Using NWDI the customer develop his custom applications in his own name space . During the BUILD_COMPONENT_LIST phase of the upgrade ,the upgrade tool displays a list of all the SAP and custom objects which are not a part of the stackXML . We need to take a decision on these objects. The upgrade offers two options as "SCAN INBOX" or  "REMOVE" . Now if you want to proceed with keeping the components , you have to provide a successor to these packages in the EPS in box . If no successor is provided the components will be completely removed.

What can be done to keep the custom developments

---------------------------------------------------------------

Now on releases 7.0x the used java version id java 1.4.1 or 1.5.1 depending upon the release. On Nw 7.3 or higher the java gets switched to SAPJVM 6.x.

The custom objects are on NW 7.0 release . Now these successor packages are based on NWDI on NW7.3 based on SAPJVM 6.X . So the successor packages are SCA files created on target release . Now how to migrate the packages from NW 7.0x to NW 7.3 and higher is clearly described in the below SCN doc

http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10b84b1f-9d37-2f10-bc9e-e61d943bfa7a?overridelayout=t…

Now the components deployed in NW 7.3 NWDI have to be bundled into SCA file and they have to be provided as successor package . The SUM tool only accepts SCA files. If now successors are provided , the components will be un-deployed as the system is being upgraded to NW 7.3 or higher up releases.

Now there is another crude way of carrying forward the changes. You may have to take a backup of the existing objects in lower release. During the BUILD_COMPONENT_LIST phase ,you may choose the option to "Remove" . The upgrade tool will upgrade the system and you may redeploy the custom developments again. But this approach will pollute the system with SDA's which are not bundled into SCA's . This will again cause problem during the next upgrade if components are not present as SCA's . So this is not recommended as a correct approach.

Hi,

Can anyone give me some idea on this upgrade:

Details of Current Servers are:

OS:- Windows Server 2003 (32 Bit)

Database Version:- Oracle 9.2.0.8

SAP: SAP R/3 ENTERPRISE 47X110 (Non-Unicode)

Details of New Servers:

OS:- Windows Server 2008 R2 (64 Bit)

Database Version:- Oracle 11.2

SAP: SAP ERP 6.0 EHP6

Can anyone share best approach to complete this upgrade with optimized downtime.

If we want to install same current version of SAP in Windows 2008 64-bit, we do not have DVD available for 4.7. PAM also says not supported.

Please suggest Best approach.

Thanks,

Srikanth

Dear Friends,

I am getting error  when importing sap router certificate it was expired on 18.02.2013.

By today i am trying to renewal but getting error.

D:\usr\sap\saprouter>sapgenpse.exe import_own_cert -c srcert -p local.pse

import_own_cert: Installation of certificate failed

ERROR in ssf_install_CA_response: (9/0x0009) af_verify_Certificates failed

ERROR in ssf_install_certs_into_pse: (9/0x0009) af_verify_Certificates failed

ERROR in af_verify_Certificates: (101/0x0065) Certificate expired (notbefore=120

218112016Z, notafter=130218112016Z, now=131227070143Z)

ERROR in af_check_validity_of_Certificate: (101/0x0065) Certificate expired (not

before=120218112016Z, notafter=130218112016Z, now=131227070143Z)

Please suggest as soon as possible.

Thanks

Santosh

Hello Expert,

We are upgrading ECC 6.0 to ECC 6.0 EHP 6 ,I would like to know the effect on SD VC master data like class, procedure ,user interface design,dependencies,characteristics ,change number master and VC configuration etc.

We have approximate 1800 characteristics with more than 200 dependencies  with thousands line of code in procedure,preselection, selection,constraint,variant table,variant function  and some enhancement in function module etc. Its huge data so I am worried if anything goes wrong then it will be big mess.

Please suggest for better execution of new EHP 6.

Regards,

Vipin

Hi all,

I am assigned a new solman server in client place which has been already installed.When the db has been started manual by me and it is mounted.when i login to sidadm and run startsap.

No SQL*NET connect to USM Aviable.

check that the listener is running :"lsnrctl status"

start the listener from orasid:"lsnrctl start"

usr/sap/USM/SYS/exe/run/startdb terminating with return code 14 db start up failed.

I have started the listener.

Kindly help with the issue.

Thanks.

Is it possible to set in config as follows:

1. Posting of down payment document, the fund status of the document is not statistical.

2. Posting of down payment transfer document, the fund status of the document is statistical.

3. Posting of down payment clearance document, the fund status of the document is not statistical.

The objective of no.2 is to avoid the standard processing of funds availability checking against the fund objects during posting of down payment transfer document.

Thanks

Thomas

Hi,

When payment lot created automatically, the payment document was not created in Sap FICA.

Even i checked the reason which is"No number range found for document type BE"

Number range is configured correctly for mass processing. Kindly suggest the solution to fix up the issue.

Regards,

Periasamy Mani

Hi All,

We are performing an enhancement package instalation from ECC6 to ECC6

EHP6.

Initial SP level Basis 700 sp12

We are currently on the downtime step, in phase EU_SWITCH.and we are

getting the folowing error in file MSSPROCSTHROW.LOG

"Msg 50000, Level 16, State 62, Server SQC6001SAP16, Line 79

Creation of stored procedure 'sap_zz_create_jobs' threw SQL Error 2812:

Could not find stored procedure 'sap_perf_job_add'.

Execution completed successfully"

Didn't find much information about this.

Any ideas?

Regards,

Bruno

Hi

I want to understand as to 'What is the exact use of keyword during the upgrade with SUM'?

Can somebody pls clarify me on this? Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Vinesh.

Hi all,

Wishing all of you a very Happy New Year 2014 !!!

During SAP Upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 EHP 6 i'm getting a error during Preprocessing phase:

Severe error(s) occured in phase MAIN_SHDIMP/SUBMOD_SHDALIASCRE/EU_CLONE_CRE_SHDVIEWS!

Last error code set: No entry with key 'SAI_ADDRESS_V'.

For the resolution i followed SAP Note 1902974 but still the issue persists with output as below :

sapqty: qtyadm 74> tp execdbscript -X ../var/CDSVIEWFIX.TQL QTY

pf=var/DEFAULT.TPP

This is tp version 340.16.72 (release 640)

Warning: unknown parameter PARALLEL in parameter file (line 16).

Warning: unknown parameter DYNAMIC_PARAMETERS in parameter file (line

18).

Warning: unknown parameter MAX_SEMAPHORE_WAIT in parameter file (line

20).

Warning: unknown parameter PARALLEL in parameter file (line 16).

Warning: unknown parameter DYNAMIC_PARAMETERS in parameter file (line

18).

Warning: unknown parameter MAX_SEMAPHORE_WAIT in parameter file (line

20).

Warning: Parameter DBCONFPATH is no longer used.

ERROR: Statement: UPDATE "PUTTB_SHD" SET PACKETNR = '98' WHERE

WCONTENT = 'V' AND ( TABNAME IN ( SELECT OBJECTNAME FROM

"DDLDEPENDENCY~"

) OR MODEFLAG = 'W' )

ERROR: ERROR 512: DB object does not exist

ERROR: SQL ERROR 942: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

ERROR: Statement: UPDATE "PUTTB_SHD_STD" SET PACKETNR = '98' WHERE

WCONTENT = 'V' AND ( TABNAME IN ( SELECT OBJECTNAME FROM

"DDLDEPENDENCY~"

) OR MODEFLAG = 'W' )

ERROR: ERROR 512: DB object does not exist

ERROR: SQL ERROR 942: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

ERROR: Statement: UPDATE "PUTTB_SHD_SHD" SET PACKETNR = '98' WHERE

WCONTENT = 'V' AND ( TABNAME IN ( SELECT OBJECTNAME FROM

"DDLDEPENDENCY~"

) OR MODEFLAG = 'W' )

ERROR: ERROR 512: DB object does not exist

ERROR: SQL ERROR 942: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

tp returncode summary:

TOOLS: Highest return code of single steps was: 0

ERRORS: Highest tp internal error was: 0237

tp finished with return code: 237

meaning:

  SQL-error

For reference i'm attaching error log file with the message.Please support me to resolve the issue.

Best Regards,

Gaurav Rana

Hi,

For SAP Upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 and during pre upgrade activity i'm getting error UMG_PMIG_PREP_JOB Cancelled.After checking details this background job cancelled with error IMPORT_FORMAT_ERROR.

When attempting to IMPORT the object "STA", there was a format error.

Unable to read an IMPORT dataset.

The dataset may have been processed using SQL and is

thus no longer readable for the IMPORT.

Under ST22 dump created as attached.For resolution followed SAP Note : 542302

Please support me to resolve the same.

Regards,

Gaurav Rana

Hi,

We have 3 system landscape and want to maintain a parallel landscape during the upgrade.

how can i have a new landscape with same hostname on Windows ? I can have it in WORKGROUP but not sure if we can move the transports between the systems.

can you please advise how to main a new landscape having the same hostname without effecting the current landscape ?

Hi all,

I'm upgrading a system from 4.5B to ECC 6.0. I need to unlock the system in order to log in with a user different from DDIC.

SAPup is now in phase PARCONV_UPG (387/505). The shadow instance is not available any more, so SAPup is working only in the real instance.

When I try to execute

tp unlocksys TEC pf=/usr/sap/trans/bin/TP_DOMAIN_TEC.PFL

an error occurs ( see below  )

I have also tried with

tp unlocksys TEC pf=<dir_trans>//DEFAULT.TPP

with the same results.  Any ideas?

Thank you very much in advance.

Best Regards

TRACE-INFO: 16:    *** ERROR => DlLoadLib()==DLENOACCESS - dlopen("libdb2.a(shr_64.o)") FAILED      1935  0.006630

TRACE-INFO: 17:                          "      0509-022 Cannot load module shr_64.o.

TRACE-INFO: 18:                         0509-026 System error: A file or directory in the path name does not exist."  (errno=2,No such file or directory)

TRACE-INFO: 19:    Could not load DB2 library libdb2.a(shr_64.o).  No database connection possible.

TRACE-INFO: 20:                                                                                77  0.006707

tp returncode summary:

TOOLS: Highest return code of single steps was: 0

ERRORS: Highest tp internal error was: 0232

tp finished with return code: 232

Edited by: Francisco José Martínez Carretero on Aug 31, 2010 3:50 PM

Hi Team,

I have few doubt with regard to change of material type.

When i googled about the procedure to change the material type I come to know that the pre-requisite to change materials is Open Pos and Vendor open line items with regard to the materials should be not be there. My query is why there should not be vendor open line items for the material. Coz once we book invoice through T code MIRO financial liability is created on us and the open line item is cleared wen next paymenth run is taken place. So please clarify.

Second: If we need to clear vendor open line items before we change the material type please explain me how to find out the vendor open items for a material. In t code FBL1N we can find out open items only but it is not possible to find out against a particular material.

Thanks & regards,

Lavanya

7893914343